Date: | Sep 10, 2007 |
---|---|
Location: | DC 2363 |
Time: | 1:30 |
Chair: | ![]() Paul Church |
Date: | Sep 17, 2007 ?? | Sep 24, 2007 ?? | Oct 1, 2007 ?? | Oct 8, 2007 ?? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Location: | DC 1304 1:30 ?? | DC 1304 1:30 ?? | DC 1304 1:30 ?? | DC 1304 1:30 ?? | Chair: | ![]() Bill Cowan |
![]() Jeff Dicker |
![]() Elodie Fourquet |
![]() Craig Kaplan |
Technical Presentation: | ![]() Jie Xu |
![]() Paul Church |
![]() Bill Cowan |
![]() Jeff Dicker |
![]() Michael Terry |
Title : Illustrated Consent Agreements
Abstract:Consent agreements tend to be lengthy, text-based documents describing the terms agreed to when using a piece of software. These terms can range from legal conditions to privacy terms to risks involved in participating in an experimental study. As important as these agreements are, recent research suggests that less than 2% of users actually take time to read them. In this talk, I present Illustrated Consent Agreements as a way to increase the chance that people under the substantive content of a consent agreement. I demonstrate the concept with the illustrations developed to accompany ingimp's consent agreement. These illustrations occupy a distinct communication niche. As such, I describe our design process and the techniques we employed to help people teach themselves how to read the illustrations. |
---|
Also see other Math and CS postings.